Rājataraṅgiṇī
Rājataraṅgiṇī is the earliest source of information on Kashmir and its neighbours in the Indian subcontinent and has been widely referenced by later historians and ethnographers. It consists of 7826 verses divided into eight books called taraṅgas. Rājataraṅgiṇī is a Sanskrit epic poem written around 1148 in Kashmir by Kalhaṇa. It accounts for the many royal dynasties that ruled the ancient kingdom of Kashmir from its mythical origins to the poet’s time. It has gained iconic stature due to its deference to chronology, causation, and objectivity. Rājataraṅgiṇī is a rehabilitated ancient Indic text in its parent genre, kavya, and literary culture. It is distinguished by figuration including myth, rhetoric, and didacticism. Also, it reflects the poetic structure and narrativity of the text. Recent approaches to rehabilitating the text have revealed that it has a culturally specific yet universal knowledge of time and human action.
Rājataraṅgiṇī’s themes of mortality and desertion of human life and action are based on temporality and its ever-attendant quality of change. It begins by describing itself as a balancing remedy for kings who may be seized by change. A certain universality and inevitability attach to the march of history in this vision.
Rājataraṅgiṇī’s themes of mortality and desertion of human life and action are based on temporality and its ever-attendant quality of change. It begins by describing itself as a balancing remedy for kings who may be seized by change. A certain universality and inevitability attach to the march of history in this vision.
The Rājataraṅgiṇī provides a continuous chronology of the region, assigning dates to the ascension and end of each dynasty using traditional Indian calendars. Aśōka, kuśāna, tōramaṇa, and mihirākula were important rulers who ruled over and integrated Kashmir into transregional Indian kingdoms. The Valley is littered with gold, silver, copper, and alloyed coins, attesting to their presence.
The text describes the powerful Kashmiri kings of the eighth century, including Lalitāditya muktapīḍa (8th century), Avantivarman (9th century), and Didda (9th century) (10th century). These kings conducted extensive conquests and raids in eastern India, central and western Asia, and the Middle East.
The Rājataraṅgiṇī recounts the political events that occurred during the reigns of successive rulers and courtiers, offering a variety of plausible historical explanations for them. It seeks to investigate the general and specific causes of the events, and Kalhaṇa claims to be unattached to them.
The Rājataraṅgiṇī is a highly critical work in Kashmiri kings and queens that moralises the events and actions it describes with praise and adoration for righteousness and denunciation and contempt for wrongdoing, expressed in obscene or scatological terms. This is a rare expression in Sanskrit poetry, and espousing ethics was essential to his textual and historical agenda.
Rājataraṅgiṇī is a work that focuses on the condition of its subjects under both tyrannical and exploitative kings. It emphasises the importance of welfare (Prajānupālanaṁ) as a constant refrain and a crucible for judging any king’s rule.
The text describes the powerful Kashmiri kings of the eighth century, including Lalitāditya muktapīḍa (8th century), Avantivarman (9th century), and Didda (9th century) (10th century). These kings conducted extensive conquests and raids in eastern India, central and western Asia, and the Middle East.
The Rājataraṅgiṇī recounts the political events that occurred during the reigns of successive rulers and courtiers, offering a variety of plausible historical explanations for them. It seeks to investigate the general and specific causes of the events, and Kalhaṇa claims to be unattached to them.
The Rājataraṅgiṇī is a highly critical work in Kashmiri kings and queens that moralises the events and actions it describes with praise and adoration for righteousness and denunciation and contempt for wrongdoing, expressed in obscene or scatological terms. This is a rare expression in Sanskrit poetry, and espousing ethics was essential to his textual and historical agenda.
Rājataraṅgiṇī is a work that focuses on the condition of its subjects under both tyrannical and exploitative kings. It emphasises the importance of welfare (Prajānupālanaṁ) as a constant refrain and a crucible for judging any king’s rule.
Rājataraṅgiṇī is considered the first and only work of history to emerge from ancient India. European Orientalist scholars studied it from the early 19th century onwards, believing it to be a unique exception in three thousand years of Sanskrit literary culture. Scholars such as Harold Wilson, George Buhler and Marcus Aurel Stein, Arthur Lewellyn Basham, and Indian historians of different ideological persuasions embraced and echoed the text’s uniqueness and historical character
Rājataraṅgiṇī is a self-reflexive work of Kashmiri history that begins with a prolegomenon expressing its purpose, method and vision of history. It is based on consultation and revision of at least eleven similar Sanskrit texts before itself, with one of the oldest being Nīlamaṭha purāṇa (8th century). It also draws on other forms of pan-Indian Sanskrit literature, such as Śastra, nīti and itihāsa. It is seen to migrate among these genres and kāvya, suggesting strong intertextuality at work. The dominant scholarship on the Rājataraṅgiṇī has controversially believed it to be unique among all Sanskrit literature.
Rājataraṅgiṇī has been rehabilitated into its own literary culture and is investigated as a work of history. Whitney Cox (2013) has argued that the occurrence of Sanskrit verses in a "terse, tense" register in the later sections of the Rājataraṅgiṇī can capture the ebb and flow of the world’s genetic instability by rendering itself dense and rich enough to capture something of it. This suggests formal mimesis as the substance of Kalhaṇa’s engagement with history.
Rājataraṅgiṇī has been rehabilitated into its own literary culture and is investigated as a work of history. Whitney Cox (2013) has argued that the occurrence of Sanskrit verses in a "terse, tense" register in the later sections of the Rājataraṅgiṇī can capture the ebb and flow of the world’s genetic instability by rendering itself dense and rich enough to capture something of it. This suggests formal mimesis as the substance of Kalhaṇa’s engagement with history.
No quotations available.